Parliament’s ad hoc committee criticised for calling Vusimuzi 'Cat' Matlala to testify
Celeste Martin
3 November 2025 | 11:05Criminal defence attorney William Booth says forcing a remand detainee to testify makes no sense.
Vusumuzi 'Cat' Matlala. Picture: Kgomotso Modise/EWN
Parliament’s ad hoc committee investigating corruption allegations is preparing for a week of high-profile testimonies, including Acting Police Minister Firoz Cachalia and the NPA’s Investigating Directorate head, Advocate Andrea Johnson.
However, the committee’s decision to summon Vusimuzi "Cat" Matlala, who is currently in Kgosi Mampuru Prison, has sparked confusion and criticism.
Matlala, who faces charges of attempted murder, conspiracy to commit murder and money laundering, is still awaiting trial.
ALSO READ: How is Vusi ‘Cat’ Matlala linked to the police corruption allegations?
Court hears that Vusimuzi Matlala facing 11 attempted murder charges
Criminal defence attorney William Booth said it makes little legal sense for a remand detainee to testify before Parliament while his own case is ongoing, warning that it could waste public money and raise evidentiary risks.
Booth noted that Matlala has a constitutional right to remain silent and cannot be forced to incriminate himself.
"He doesn't have to answer any questions that may incriminate himself; that is the law in this country. Why have him come and testify? If I were his lawyer, I would advise him not to say anything, certainly until his own case is completed."
"Is this not a waste of taxpayers' money?"
To listen to William Booth in conversation with CapeTalk's Lester Kiewit, click the audio below:
Get the whole picture 💡
Take a look at the topic timeline for all related articles.














