Usindiso building fire trial: Magistrate says its common for accused to seek to reverse confessions
The court is currently conducting a trial-within-a-trial as self-confessed arsonist Sthembiso Mdlalose is challenging the validity of his own confession.
Pieter du Plessis, the senior magistrate who recorded Sthembiso Mdlalose’s confession, gave testimonial evidence on behalf of the State on 23 April 2025. Picture: Alpha Ramushwana/EWN
JOHANNESBURG - The Palm Ridge Magistrates Court continues to hear testimony from State witnesses in the case against the man accused of setting the Usindiso building alight.
The court is currently conducting a trial-within-a-trial as self-confessed arsonist Sthembiso Mdlalose is challenging the validity of his confession.
ALSO READ: Alleged Usindiso building fire arsonist claims he was threatened by drug lord to confess
Mdlalose claims he wasn’t sober and was under duress when he admitted to setting the hijacked building on fire, which killed 76 people.
Senior Magistrate Pieter du Plessis, who recorded Mdlalose’s confession in January 2024, is testifying on Wednesday.
He said it’s common for accused persons to attempt to reverse their own confession.
"I must indicate that according to my experience, 90%-95% of confession end up here because once most know what they are facing and that they can have legal reparation, they then elect that."
Du Plessis, the magistrate to whom Sthembiso Mdlalose confessed, denies that the self-confessed arsonist was under the influence of drugs when he admitted to the crime. @JusstAlpha pic.twitter.com/2as0y79DsX
— EWN Reporter (@ewnreporter) April 23, 2025