SA's private security regulator rubbishes claims that it's trying to disarm sector
Industry experts harshly criticised the amendments, saying they would create an administrative burden for private security companies.
- Private Security Industry Regulatory Authority (PSiRA)
- South African Police Service (SAPS)
- Senzo Mchunu
FILE: Private security guards stand guard at the scene of a burned apartment block in Johannesburg on 1 September 2023. Picture: Luca Sola/AFP
JOHANNESBURG - The Private Security Industry Regulatory Authority (PSIRA) has rejected claims that it is trying to disarm the sector.
Last week, Police Minister Senzo Mchunu made draft amendments to the Private Security Industry Regulation Act to impose tighter restrictions on what firearms and ammunition private security companies may possess.
Industry experts harshly criticised the amendments, saying they would create an administrative burden for private security companies.
PSIRA CEO Manabela Chauke says they don’t want to disarm private security, but rather safeguard the public against the excessive use of unnecessary force by private security firms.
ALSO READ: Private security companies say amendments to the Regulation Act can't be implemented
"You may use these weapons, but for you to use these weapons, there are requirements, and the first requirement we’re saying that you should do a risk assessment and tell us if it is necessary for you to use that weapon there, and is it in the public interest."
He says the amendments in no way seek to disarm private security companies.
"We had one incident where a rifle was discharged in a mall and a child was hurt, that guard was meant to have an ordinary pistol, if he was required to carry a pistol. You cannot operate if you violate the public's rights, and that is what we’re seeking to protect."
The public has until 25 April to make submissions regarding the amendments.