Zuma given until Wed to propose appropriate sentence if found guilty: report

Zuma's lawyer has confirmed that he received the letter from Chief Justice Mogoeng Mogoeng giving Zuma until Wednesday to reply with an affidavit of not more than 15 pages.

FILE: Former President Jacob Zuma at the state capture commission on 19 July 2019. Picture: Abigail Javier/Eyewitness News.

JOHANNESBURG - Former President Jacob Zuma’s lawyer Eric Mabuza on Friday said he was yet to consult his client on a Constitutional Court letter asking him to propose an appropriate sentence if found guilty of contempt of court.

Mabuza confirms that Zuma has received the letter that News24 said was from Chief Justice Mogoeng Mogoeng.

READ: Zuma warns of 'judicial dictatorship', claims judges taking power to themselves

In it, Zuma has been given until Wednesday to reply with an affidavit of not more than 15 pages.

It is still unclear if the former president will honour the directive.

Neither his lawyer nor his foundation -- the two avenues for his communications -- replied to repeated attempts for comment.

Experts say it was uncommon for the court to issue such a directive.

He didn’t make representations when the commission made its application asking the court to sentence him to two years.

Zuma had failed to appear at the commission after the Constitutional Court ordered him to respect its summons.

WATCH: Zuma: The law is too soft on criminals

Zuma, 79, repeatedly snubbed a judicial panel investigating the plunder of state coffers during his nine-year rule, claiming bias on the part of its chair and political interference in the judiciary.

The former head of state testified only once in July 2019 before staging a walkout days later.

On January 28, the Constitutional Court ordered Zuma to appear before the commission - led by Deputy Chief Justice Raymond Zondo - but he ignored the order.

Zondo then petitioned the country's top court to jail the scandal-tainted former leader for two years for contempt.

But a defiant Zuma skipped the hearing last month and did not file required affidavits.

The court now wants Zuma to determine "what constitutes the appropriate sanction" if he is found guilty.


The decision creates an impression of special treatment, said James Grant, a constitutional lawyer, but he added that a soft landing could also spell bad news for Zuma.

The court's judges are "bending over backwards to accommodate him... and are preparing to give him a harsh sentence. They want to show themselves as having taken every possible opportunity to hear from him," Grant explained.

Law professor Omphemetse Sibanda of the University of Limpopo warned that the court's actions could spell disaster for the country.

In the long term, courts risk being abused by a "clique of rogue powerful elite and politicians as if South Africa is a mafia state where the judiciary is responsible to the politicians," he wrote in a column on News24 website.

Zuma had earlier this year compared the courts to the apartheid judiciary functioning under white minority rule.

While highlighting his own anti-apartheid exploits, Zuma said in a statement that he was ready for "the law to take its course" and did not fear being arrested, convicted or incarcerated.

"The wrath visited upon me as an individual knows no bounds," he said.

Zuma's defiance has split his ruling African National Congress (ANC) party with one faction, led by President Cyril Ramaphosa, vowing to stamp out corruption.

The country's highest court will make its ruling at an undecided later date.

The findings of the anti-corruption commission will not lead directly to indictments but may be handed to the prosecution for possible charges.

Zuma, who came to power in 2009, was forced to resign in 2018 over graft scandals involving an Indian business family, the Guptas -- who won lucrative contracts with state companies and were allegedly even able to choose Cabinet ministers.

Additional reporting by AFP.

Download the Eyewitness News app to your iOS or Android device.