• Home
  • Local
  • Sport
  • Lifestyle
  • Politics
  • Opinion
  • Business
  • Video
  • Multimedia
  • Audio
  • Infographics
  • Cartoons
  • Features
  • Breaking News
  • Cricket World Cup
  • Comments Policy
  • Contact Us
  • EWN Apps
  • Whatsapp
  • Terms and Conditions
1'

Shaun Abrahams' credibility questioned in Lesotho case

Abrahams is representing the state in its case against controversial former army commander Tlali Kamoli.

  • Shaun Abrahams
  • Lesotho
  • Tlali Kamoli
  • LDF commander Tlali Kamoli
  • Maaparankoe Mahao
  • Charles hungwe
Nthakoana Ngatane | one hour ago

JOHANNESBURG - The credibility of disgraced former prosecutions boss Shaun Abrahams and Zimbabwean judge Charles Hungwe is being questioned in Lesotho.

Abrahams is representing the state in its case against controversial former army commander Tlali Kamoli and other soldiers accused of killing another former army commander Maaparankoe Mahao.

The soldiers were already questioning the fairness of the judge.

But when Abrahams asked the court to sentence them to death if they were found guilty, and the judge allowed him to proceed amid their objections, they decided to take the judge on.

In 2015, Lesotho's former army commander Maaparankoe Mahao was killed, allegedly by soldiers who said they were attempting to arrest him for mutiny.

The soldiers and Kamoli were arrested and charged.

The state has roped in Abrahams as a prosecutor - as well as judges from Botswana and Zimbabwe - because both the crown and the defendants wanted neutral lawyers and judges.

But the soldiers first took exception when Zimbabwean judge Charles Hungwe called them a "gang of military officers who took down the deceased".

They complained that this suggested that the judge had already made a finding that they were acting unlawfully in effecting the arrest.

In addition to this, they alleged that the prosecution led by Abrahams lied about the number of witnesses they are calling.

Their application for the judge's recusal said that the judge allowed Abrahams to read an indictment that they were not served with which was different from the one that their lawyers retrieved from the court file.

The applicants said that they could not take the judge's actions lightly and they suspected he would be unfair.

  • NEXT ARTICLE
  • Home DOWNLOADED UPDATE AVAILABLE

  • Local DOWNLOADED UPDATE AVAILABLE

  • Sport DOWNLOADED UPDATE AVAILABLE

  • Lifestyle DOWNLOADED UPDATE AVAILABLE

  • Politics DOWNLOADED UPDATE AVAILABLE

  • Opinion DOWNLOADED UPDATE AVAILABLE

  • Business DOWNLOADED UPDATE AVAILABLE

  • Video DOWNLOADED UPDATE AVAILABLE

  • Multimedia DOWNLOADED UPDATE AVAILABLE

  • Audio DOWNLOADED UPDATE AVAILABLE

  • Infographics DOWNLOADED UPDATE AVAILABLE

  • Cartoons DOWNLOADED UPDATE AVAILABLE

  • Features DOWNLOADED UPDATE AVAILABLE

  • Breaking News DOWNLOADED UPDATE AVAILABLE

  • Cricket World Cup DOWNLOADED UPDATE AVAILABLE

  • Comments Policy DOWNLOADED UPDATE AVAILABLE

  • Contact Us DOWNLOADED UPDATE AVAILABLE

  • EWN Apps DOWNLOADED UPDATE AVAILABLE

  • Whatsapp DOWNLOADED UPDATE AVAILABLE

  • Terms and Conditions DOWNLOADED UPDATE AVAILABLE