Law expert slams ‘preposterous’ findings on Zille’s colonialism tweets
Constitutional law expert Pierre de Vos says Advocate Busisiwe Mkhwebane’s reliance on Section 16(2)(b) of the Bill of Rights suggests she lacks the most basic understanding of Constitutional Law.
De Vos has argued that the report will be found to be irrational and eventually set aside by a court when taken on review.
Zille tweeted in 2017 that for those claiming that the legacy of colonialism was only negative, they should look at various aspects of South Africa’s development.
Mkhwebane found that the comment not only violated sections of the Executive Members Ethics Code, but also the Constitution.
Mkhwebane held that Section 16(2)(b) of the Bill of Rights prohibits people from making offensive or insensitive comments.
De Vos says firstly, the Public Protector is not empowered by law to investigate alleged infringements of the Bill of Rights. Further, he says the section referred to does not prohibit anyone from doing anything but rather sets out which forms of expression are not protected.
De Vos says Mkhwebane’s reliance on this section suggests she lacks the most basic understanding of Constitutional Law.
Zille has confirmed she will take the report on the judicial review.
(Edited by Zamangwane Shange)