20°C / 22°C
  • Tue
  • 19°C
  • 4°C
  • Wed
  • 19°C
  • 5°C
  • Thu
  • 19°C
  • 5°C
  • Fri
  • 21°C
  • 4°C
  • Sat
  • 19°C
  • 4°C
  • Sun
  • 18°C
  • 4°C
  • Tue
  • 18°C
  • 8°C
  • Wed
  • 22°C
  • 10°C
  • Thu
  • 21°C
  • 10°C
  • Fri
  • 19°C
  • 9°C
  • Sat
  • 16°C
  • 11°C
  • Sun
  • 15°C
  • 9°C
  • Tue
  • 20°C
  • 6°C
  • Wed
  • 21°C
  • 8°C
  • Thu
  • 20°C
  • 7°C
  • Fri
  • 22°C
  • 3°C
  • Sat
  • 20°C
  • 5°C
  • Sun
  • 20°C
  • 7°C
  • Tue
  • 20°C
  • 2°C
  • Wed
  • 20°C
  • 4°C
  • Thu
  • 19°C
  • 2°C
  • Fri
  • 20°C
  • 0°C
  • Sat
  • 20°C
  • 1°C
  • Sun
  • 18°C
  • 1°C
  • Tue
  • 22°C
  • 13°C
  • Wed
  • 23°C
  • 14°C
  • Thu
  • 22°C
  • 16°C
  • Fri
  • 23°C
  • 14°C
  • Sat
  • 23°C
  • 13°C
  • Sun
  • 19°C
  • 13°C
  • Tue
  • 17°C
  • 10°C
  • Wed
  • 20°C
  • 10°C
  • Thu
  • 26°C
  • 16°C
  • Fri
  • 22°C
  • 15°C
  • Sat
  • 19°C
  • 10°C
  • Sun
  • 13°C
  • 10°C
  • Tue
  • 19°C
  • 9°C
  • Wed
  • 25°C
  • 9°C
  • Thu
  • 22°C
  • 12°C
  • Fri
  • 22°C
  • 9°C
  • Sat
  • 13°C
  • 5°C
  • Sun
  • 14°C
  • 5°C
  • Tue
  • 17°C
  • 12°C
  • Wed
  • 22°C
  • 12°C
  • Thu
  • 21°C
  • 13°C
  • Fri
  • 20°C
  • 13°C
  • Sat
  • 13°C
  • 9°C
  • Sun
  • 14°C
  • 8°C
  • Tue
  • 20°C
  • 5°C
  • Wed
  • 22°C
  • 6°C
  • Thu
  • 20°C
  • 5°C
  • Fri
  • 21°C
  • 4°C
  • Sat
  • 20°C
  • 5°C
  • Sun
  • 21°C
  • 6°C
  • Tue
  • 18°C
  • 0°C
  • Wed
  • 19°C
  • 3°C
  • Thu
  • 18°C
  • 3°C
  • Fri
  • 18°C
  • 2°C
  • Sat
  • 17°C
  • 3°C
  • Sun
  • 16°C
  • 2°C
  • Tue
  • 22°C
  • 5°C
  • Wed
  • 23°C
  • 4°C
  • Thu
  • 20°C
  • 6°C
  • Fri
  • 19°C
  • 5°C
  • Sat
  • 22°C
  • 4°C
  • Sun
  • 17°C
  • 5°C
  • Tue
  • 18°C
  • 10°C
  • Wed
  • 22°C
  • 9°C
  • Thu
  • 26°C
  • 17°C
  • Fri
  • 23°C
  • 14°C
  • Sat
  • 15°C
  • 7°C
  • Sun
  • 12°C
  • 7°C

OPINION: Globalisation for the 99%, can we make it work for all?

On 23 June, in a historic referendum, the British public made a decision that would reverberate across the world: they voted to leave the European Union. Within just a few hours of the news, $2 trillion was wiped off global stock prices, the pound sterling plunged to a 30-year low, and decision-makers in Europe and beyond were left wondering what it all meant.

To many of them, it was clear: this was about more than the EU. It was a vote of no confidence against globalisation. "There has been a backlash against globalisation," Nouriel Roubini, best known as the economist who predicted the last financial crisis, told participants at a recent Forum meeting.

But for every person expressing shock at the outcome of the referendum, there are others who wonder how we didn't see this coming. After all, globalisation has been on life-support for some time. Just last month, the IMF, one of the biggest advocates of globalisation, questioned whether the process had been as positive as promised.

Is this the great unravelling of globalisation? Or can it still be fixed to make sure it works for the many, not just the few? That's a question we'll be tackling in a series of articles and videos this month.

THE TWO SIDES OF GLOBALISATION

Any discussion on the merits and failings of globalisation must recognise one undeniable fact: it has, for many people, been a great force for good.

"In aggregate terms, the human race has never had it so good. Life expectancy has risen by more in the past 50 years than in the previous 1,000. When the Berlin Wall fell, two-fifths of humanity lived in extreme poverty. Now it's one-eighth," write Ian Goldin and Chris Kutarna of Oxford University.

But this isn't to say that there haven't been problems along the way. Yes, many people have gained immensely from globalisation. But others have been left behind. And no amount of data on the so-called benefits of a more connected world will make them feel better.

"Statistical proof of overall well-being is cold comfort to a middle class whose real wages have stagnated, or to poor people in the US and other so-called 'rich' countries whose poverty has deepened," Goldin and Kutarna argue.

Joseph Stiglitz, a Nobel Prize-winning economist who has written extensively on this topic, agrees that this is the root cause of the current backlash against globalisation. "We've never had a democratic globalisation. The lack of transparency and openness has meant that we've wound up with a form of globalisation that works for a few, but not for all of us," he explains in a video.

The difference today, Stiglitz argues, is that the biggest losers from globalisation are no longer staying silent. "Citizens now are beginning to understand that globalisation matters. They are demanding a voice."

A NEW APPROACH TO AN OLD DEBATE

Of course, pointing out its failings does not mean abandoning globalisation completely. "To shun holistic global engagement because of such hazards would be a missed opportunity," writes Calestous Juma of Harvard University. His article does something that's normally missing from the globalisation debate: it looks at it from a non-Western perspective.

"The last three decades have been marked by intense political activism against globalisation. The opposition, however, has been driven by a narrow view that equates globalisation with international trade liberalisation advanced by Western countries. But globalisation is about more than that."

Africa is moving towards more regional and global integration, after decades of near-isolation. The West's backlash against globalisation should not deter them, Juma maintains. In fact, Africa could even provide a model for a new, less flawed form of globalisation.

It's a similar argument advanced by Brownkey Abdullahi, a refugee and women's rights advocate who was born and raised in the Dadaab camp, and has never experienced this globalised world that's currently up for debate.

The small amounts of globalisation she has benefited from, (limited) internet access, for example, have already made a large and positive difference in her life. But it's not gone far enough, and her story is unfortunately far from unique.

"The process of globalisation is a complex one, there is no questioning that. But as I watch those who have felt at least some of its benefits turn their backs on globalisation, I can only hope that I will one day have the same opportunities it has offered them."

It's a similar argument advanced by Brownkey Abdullahi, a refugee and women's rights advocate who was born and raised in the Dadaab camp, and has never experienced this globalised world that's currently up for debate.

The small amounts of globalisation she has benefited from, (limited) internet access, for example, have already made a large and positive difference in her life. But it's not gone far enough, and her story is unfortunately far from unique.

"The process of globalisation is a complex one, there is no questioning that. But as I watch those who have felt at least some of its benefits turn their backs on globalisation, I can only hope that I will one day have the same opportunities it has offered them."

It's a similar argument advanced by Brownkey Abdullahi, a refugee and women's rights advocate who was born and raised in the Dadaab camp, and has never experienced this globalised world that's currently up for debate.

The small amounts of globalisation she has benefited from, (limited) internet access, for example, have already made a large and positive difference in her life. But it's not gone far enough, and her story is unfortunately far from unique.

"The process of globalisation is a complex one, there is no questioning that. But as I watch those who have felt at least some of its benefits turn their backs on globalisation, I can only hope that I will one day have the same opportunities it has offered them."

Alden outlines a range of ways for making globalisation work, some that will be greeted with almost unanimous support, skills development for those whose jobs are displaced, and others that are slightly more controversial, a basic universal income and a (limited) restoration of some forms of trade protectionism.

His conclusion sets out what might be the most important question in this series, and indeed in the globalisation debate more broadly: "Rather than marking the end of support for globalisation in the rich countries, the current political climate offers a second chance to get it right. The question is whether political leadership in the West can rise to meet that challenge.

Stéphanie Thomson is editor, World Economic Forum

This piece was first published by the World Economic Forum

Comments

EWN welcomes all comments that are constructive, contribute to discussions in a meaningful manner and take stories forward.

However, we will NOT condone the following:

- Racism (including offensive comments based on ethnicity and nationality)
- Sexism
- Homophobia
- Religious intolerance
- Cyber bullying
- Hate speech
- Derogatory language
- Comments inciting violence.

We ask that your comments remain relevant to the articles they appear on and do not include general banter or conversation as this dilutes the effectiveness of the comments section.

We strive to make the EWN community a safe and welcoming space for all.

EWN reserves the right to: 1) remove any comments that do not follow the above guidelines; and, 2) ban users who repeatedly infringe the rules.

Should you find any comments upsetting or offensive you can also flag them and we will assess it against our guidelines.

EWN is constantly reviewing its comments policy in order to create an environment conducive to constructive conversations.

comments powered by Disqus