OPINION: Why Italy's income-based scheme for university fees makes sense
This article first appeared on The Conversation.
Could a potential solution to South Africa's tertiary fees crisis be found in some of Italy's private universities? These institutions have implemented a sliding fee scale that is set using a student's total household income. I speak from experience here, having benefited from such a scheme at the private university I attended in Italy.
How it works
The income-based tuition fee system considers the broader financial situation of a student's entire household. For instance, universities using this system look at:
- The income of all the members of the student's household. Most attention is paid to parents' income, but administrators also look at how much or little siblings and dependants are earning;
- The number and type of properties owned by a student's household;
- And investments, shares and any other source of income.
Students are then placed in a certain category that corresponds to a set amount of annual fees. So in a South African context, students in category one whose households have an annual income of between zero and R50,000 will pay no fees. Those whose households earn from R50,001 to R100,000 will be placed in category two and will pay lower fees than those in categories three, four and so on.
Research done after South Africa's 2011 Census found that just below 10% of the country's households would fall into category one on the scale I've outlined here. The vast majority of the country's households, according to the research, would fall into the low emerging or emerging middle class - precisely those who are currently struggling to afford tuition fees.
There's another nuance to the Italian sliding scale model. Let's say two students both fall into category two, for example. One's household is composed of four members; the other has five people living at home. The second student will pay slightly lower fees than the first one.
The idea here is that if the same annual income has to financially support more family members, then the fees should be lowered by the corresponding relative amount.
For the South African context
This system would need to be refined a little to be applied in South Africa, which is one of the world's most unequal societies. To better reflect this inequality, I'd suggest that categories should be divided in a more granular way at the very bottom and very top of the income scale.
In this way the load of higher education expenses will be divided more equally among households of different income. Richer people will pay more than the poorer.
There is also another issue to consider: how much do university fees impact on the total annual income of the household? My own experience as an undergraduate student was that my fees constituted something like 10-15% of the family's annual income. So it was tough, but still affordable.
This is the problem in South Africa: if a student's mother is the sole breadwinner and works as a cleaner earning R3000 a month after tax, tuition fees of R40,000 a year are 100% of her annual income. A student whose father works at a financial firm and earns R1,000,000 a year after tax will only be spending 4% of the household's annual income on those tuition fees.
This example doesn't even take into account the money that's needed for accommodation, books, food and anything else a student might need.
All according to their means
The " blame game" we've seen between the government and university management in the past week is not going to take South Africa anywhere.
We should all consider what is happening on our campuses as an opportunity to make a mark on the path towards a more equal society, to which everybody contributes according to their own means. The Italian model may be one way to make this a reality.
Emanuela Carleschi is a senior lecturer in Condensed Matter Physics at the University of Johannesburg.