AU asks UN about Kenya ICC deferral
Uhuru Kenyatta and his deputy William Ruto face charges of crimes against humanity.
- United Nations
- Nkosazana Dlamini Zuma
- African Union
- Uhuru Kenyatta
- International Criminal Court
- The United Nations Security Council
- Kenya mall attack
- Kenyan elections
- African Union Commission
- Crimes against humanity
- William Ruto
- Haguebased International Criminal Court
- African Union chair
- Cases of crimes against humanity
ADDIS ABABA - African Union (AU) chief Nkosazana Dlamini-Zuma asked UN Security Council envoys on Tuesday how they might react if asked to defer the international trials of Kenya's leaders so they can deal with the aftermath of the Nairobi mall attack, diplomats said.
African leaders are due to meet in the Ethiopian capital Addis Ababa this weekend to take a common stance on whether to join Kenya's planned pull-out from the International Criminal Court (ICC) over the prosecution of its leaders.
Zuma suggested that the AU could decide to formally ask the Security Council to defer trials of President Uhuru Kenyatta and his deputy William Ruto, UN diplomats said, speaking on the condition of anonymity. They were attending a meeting between Zuma and council ambassadors in Addis Ababa.
Zuma said African leaders felt that after the attack by al Qaeda-linked group al Shabaab on the Westgate centre in Nairobi last month, Kenyatta and Ruto needed to stay in Kenya instead of travelling to The Hague for their trials, the diplomats said. At least 67 people were killed in the mall assault.
Kenyatta and Ruto face charges of crimes against humanity related to the violence that followed Kenya's 2007 elections, in which 1,200 people died. Both have voluntarily complied with all the court's summonses.
Ruto's trial started last month and Kenyatta's trial is due to start in November. The cases have stirred an increasing backlash against The Hague-based court from some African governments, which regard it as a tool of Western powers.
Several Security Council envoys responded to Zuma by saying the issue of impunity was very important and that if African leaders had any perception of bias by the International Criminal Court then it should be discussed at the court's Assembly of State Parties, not the Security Council, diplomats said.
The Assembly of State Parties, made up of the 122 members of the court, is due to convene in November.
Council envoys told Zuma they would consider any AU request but noted the council had already turned down a previous deferral request in 2011 and rejected a request in May for the cases to be terminated because the council had no such power.
"There's no particular reason to think there would be a different outcome (now)," said one senior UN council envoy, speaking on condition of anonymity.
The Security Council is able to defer International Criminal Court proceedings for one year, however, it would need to adopt a resolution to do that.