Breytenbach was biased, lawyer claims
ICT lawyer Ronnie Mendelow says prosecutor Glynnis Breytenbach was biased towards Kumba.
PRETORIA - The lawyer who laid the complaint against suspended prosecutor Glynnis Breytenbach on Monday said her improper conduct was disingenuously disguised in a legal document.
Breytenbach's disciplinary hearing resumed under a new chairperson, Selby Mbenenge, in Pretoria, five months after it was halted.
The prosecutor, who was the head of the National Prosecuting Authority's specialised commercial crime unit, was suspended in April last year, apparently because of her handling of the Sishen Mining rights case.
But she insists it was an attempt by her bosses to stop the prosecution of controversial policeman Richard Mdluli.
Imperial Crown Trading (ICT)'s lawyer Ronnie Mendelow resumed his testimony after Mbenenge ruled that the hearing would not have to start from scratch.
Mendelow laid a complaint against Breytenbach, claiming she showed bias towards Mike Hellens, the advocate representing Kumba Iron Ore, the complainant in the Sishen Mining Rights case.
Mendelow said Hellens improperly drew up affidavits on behalf of the investigating officer.
"It's a highly improper degree of involvement. It was for that reason that the affidavits were so one-sided."
He added that Hellens's involvement was disingenuously disguised in the police officers' legal affidavit.
More in Local
-
SANDF to send members to help alleviate healthcare crisis in NW
-
[WATCH LIVE] Zola Skweyiya’s funeral underway in Pretoria
-
Saftu calls on members in NW to down tools until Mahumapelo goes
-
[WATCH] Ramaphosa calls for calm in Mahikeng as Supra's future hangs in balance
-
Mahumapelo remains mum on calls to step down amid violent protests
-
Satawu calls on govt to intervene to end bus strike
Comments
EWN welcomes all comments that are constructive, contribute to discussions in a meaningful manner and take stories forward.
comments powered by DisqusHowever, we will NOT condone the following:
- Racism (including offensive comments based on ethnicity and nationality)
- Sexism
- Homophobia
- Religious intolerance
- Cyber bullying
- Hate speech
- Derogatory language
- Comments inciting violence.
We ask that your comments remain relevant to the articles they appear on and do not include general banter or conversation as this dilutes the effectiveness of the comments section.
We strive to make the EWN community a safe and welcoming space for all.
EWN reserves the right to: 1) remove any comments that do not follow the above guidelines; and, 2) ban users who repeatedly infringe the rules.
Should you find any comments upsetting or offensive you can also flag them and we will assess it against our guidelines.
EWN is constantly reviewing its comments policy in order to create an environment conducive to constructive conversations.